Deconstruction deconstruction is the most important movement of the post-structural literary criticism as well as a group the most controversial as well. Perhaps there is no theory in literary criticism has raised waves of admiration and created a state of alienation and resentment, as did the dismantling in recent years. On the one hand, we find that some of the pillars of cash (such as c. Hillis Miller and Paul de Man and Geoffrey Hartmann, Harold Bloom) are pioneers disassembly in both theory and practice, despite the diversity of style, enthusiasm, and on the other hand, we find that a lot of critics who lie in box Monetary traditional look dissatisfied with the dismantling have argued that ridiculous and evil and destructive. Did not affect any intellectual center in Europe and America from the controversy in the value of this new theory in cash.
Is the dismantling of a devastating right? If yes, how to be and why? If the answer is no, then why this fear? Can not answer these questions only after understanding the concepts of dismantling basic and evaluation, and perhaps the best place from which we can achieve our goal is a book in his "writing" (2) Grammatology Of who is a San dismantling ... the outstanding work done by Jacques Derrida, the philosopher and critic of France.
I believe that research that explores Derrida and his theory of deconstruction faced obstacles main points, the first created by the method of Derrida himself characterized by raising uncertainty as well as the terminology and concepts, while the other is a series of critical views which are interpretations of interpretations are inadequate or ill-interpretations misinterpretations possible, although light wielded by some of the difficult concepts that form Derrida. And I'm going to document some of these critical comments as before and evaluate the concepts of disassembly.
PM stresses. E. M. Abrams H. Abrams to highlight the part of Derrida's theory is: "1 that the transfer consideration of the language to writing, written or printed text, 2 he sees the text in a specific way unusual" (3). Abrams did not intentionally to simplify the status of Derrida as Tvkikia through Abannioyen equated with the other French, but was marred to a great extent when he tried to identify some key words in deconstructive criticism such as "writing" ecriture and "text" text. He showed that when Derrida's writing is the printed text or written that the concept of a specific text in a way unusual.
I will prove in the course of my evaluation of Derrida and my comment was that what was stated by Abrams, nothing more than a handful of bad interpretations that did not tell us what the dismantling of things, but has not been to the dismantling of an onion.
The Newton Garver, Newton Garvar is another commentator on Derrida, as it emphasizes that Derrida is one of the philosophers of language, and it emphasizes the primacy of rhetoric to logic:
Derrida subsumed under the banner of the movement that looks at the impact that play Almlfozat utterances in the speech that it represents the actual nature of language and meaning, which, because this is the logic of justification Mstenbta rhetoric (4).
The received argument that says that the dismantling of a discipline rhetorical, with the support Hillis Miller, who says: "The dismantling search legacy bequeathed by the metaphor and the concept and the narrative in each other, and this is why the dismantling of cognitive rhetorical field" (5). Murray believes Krieger Murray Krieger that Derrida's "structural cash to overcome the structural and coerced, and may have been negated as well," adding that the attack by Derrida is "a form more recent attack, the old attack Plato the poet as a creator of myths" (6). Emphasizes Frederic Jameson Fredric Jemson Derrida denies that thought they overcome metaphysics and escape from the old model for the purpose of screening new and undiscovered (7).
It is possible that these comments are a source of misleading if the enumerated data or evaluated properly to the theory of Derrida, despite its usefulness in the process of research in disassembly, we when we Derrida with the rest of the philosophers of language who think that the logic derived from the rhetoric, this means to block the possibility of awareness of modern ideas, and the equality of Derrida's Plato and emphasized that Derrida reiterates long-standing dispute with the legendary myth is an insult to the status of Derrida, and emphasized that Derrida did not do anything but to take the attention from the "speak" to "writing" Thus, the inventory of the text in the cell particular, is misinterpretation really. The one should be cautious when approaching the secondary sources to understand Derrida and deconstruction. The split critics groups ... Either they fail to understand Derrida or abuse interpret his ideas, and for this reason can not invoke Article secondary, can not we prepare roads impassable to reach the world of disassembly, but that there Other critics like Harold Bloom, Harold Bloom and Hillis Miller and Paul de Man Paul DeMan and Jeffrey Hartmann Jeoffrey Hartman, who are as far as the authenticity of Derrida, but that each one of them is almost a school and rarely explains Derrida ... great teacher for dismantlement. The understanding of Derrida's first step towards understanding the disassembly, and is no doubt that the first step requires overzealous ideas of Derrida.
Can say that the theory of deconstruction need a lot of new analysis and any attempt by any critic is trying to analyze this theory does not need to dismantle the definition necessarily because such a complex theoretical and complex that defies definition. On the contrary, one can attempt to explain the basic terminology created by Derrida to destroy the critical tradition and to facilitate the act of dismantling ... and this is the first step which I will here, and my intention After describing the terminology and analysis that came out Derrida's answer to the question to how to enable the dismantling of the re- literary criticism, and I will in the final stages of analysis that what was described as absurd is not as well but the dismantling of the contents of the spiritual.
It is worth mentioning that the "writing" and "speak" words that Axial can begin by understanding. Enjoy these words, especially in terms of traditional concepts of language, as these concepts provide for the primacy of speech and the priority over the writing, although the spoken word "voice" phone word of Foreign Affairs and has the ability to self-erasure. As you know, the spoken word as one voice (audio) and the function is invoking the concept represented by the ultrasound. Fade and the spoken word audio or image in the process of invoking the concept, which is why they put out the same as the indication in the process of demonstrating the significance of which he is more important than anything else. Can not imagine this meaning only through ultrasound, which is indicative. It is possible to note here that there is something like the Trinity in this relationship: the mind of mankind, dal (ultrasound), meaning (concept).
Now, what the place occupied by the written word in the traditional understanding of the language? Proceeding from the traditional concept of a language known written word as a representation of the written to the spoken word: In this regard, it is D the spoken word ... and so on, "the written word is D. Dahl is secondary to the spoken word" can not do the written word of anything other than the representation of the spoken word while that the spoken word is the signifier. If I wanted to evoke the concept of "flower" I should then uttering a voice, "flower" (Flowers e), and is indicative of the ultrasound image or audio. But when I write the word "flower" What is the only representation of ultrasound through the structure of written graphic structure. Are not connected with this picture in any written relevant concept, but the picture is written can not represent the concept to the structure of it visible to the visual image as non-vocal, it's something like a spectrum. Is secondary to ultrasound can be neglected, but must be neglected.
It should be noted here that the traditional arguments that were attributed to a secondary position to the written word and place of the President of the spoken word is the metaphysical and theological arguments (. Derrida wrote in his commentary on the metaphysical basis upon which the concept of the spoken word, saying:
.... The understanding of God is the other name for logos logos as self-presence. It is possible that an infinite self and present, can also be generated through voice as a self-prescription. It is an arrangement which can be indicative of the self from which to borrow from outside itself indicative of the overwhelming influence at the same time. As well as the case with the audio experience, celebrating the experience and announces itself as the exclusion of writing, in other words, the exclusion of D "outer", "significant", "spatial" which impede the self-presence (9).
Derrida stresses that the concepts of speech and writing traditional "transmitting to the outside of the meaning" (10) logocentric, and this is another important term used by Derrida to mean what metaphysics is a vector or a vector is a theological (11). To be more precise I would like to point out that the concepts of speech and writing and may be formed by Achtrtthma and controlled by metaphysics. The truth is that this "concentration on the logos" is "centered on the sound" phonocentrism .. This belief, which believes that the sound almost transcendent reality (12) transcendental. We find that the theory of Derrida's positioning on the logos, and concentration on the sound are terms different represent a single phenomenon: evolution metaphysical metaphysical genesis of the concept of speech and understanding. It focuses on the positioning of the logos, and concentration on the sound on the sound, because these two concepts Itoldan of the belief that that sound has been mediating between the human mind and the transcendent reality. It could be argued that this argument for the concept of the Indian approach to the authority of the mantras. Which could be defined as "a sound or series of votes. We believe that the voice of authority because we believe that it can raise power condescending; it due importance to the tone of the words that Nntgaha ... How can the voice of a certain word we call them" mantra "Be in possession of power? It enjoy this privilege because we believe that the sound works as an intermediary between the logos, and transcendent authority. and I'm not trying here to confirm that the traditional Western concept of private stationed on the Logos, concentration on sound is the same concept to your mantra, but I assure there are similarities.
We note in dismantling that there is another element in "concentration on writing" graphocentrism, a term important needed explanation before entering into the theory of Derrida. It is possible to begin to say that writing writing writing graphic, and Jerafim grapheme is the letter in the alphabet, or as the total letters or groups of craft that could indicate Alfonim phoneme (which can be defined as the smallest unit of speech marked Mlfoza or a word of spoken last or other word in language). And if we know that writing can therefore be written to say that Jerafim, according to what is mentioned in the traditional concept, D exchange intended to write unit does not have any connection, except it represents the ultrasound. For this reason, we can say that the intention to write about themselves in the midst is the transmission of the importance of speech to write, which represents a reversal of the concept of the traditional view that the priority of speech or the spoken word on the writing or the written word.
There are a number of critics believe that the dismantling of which was brought by Derrida is a shift from concentration on the logos to be concentrated on writing (13), and this is not the Note is innocent and must express their meaning by dragging out the explanation, I believe that the best way to clarify this issue is to try to simplify the matter by measurement. If it can be compared with writing and speaking and the concept they represent, body, spirit and the transcendent reality, then the focus is on speech is to focus on the Spirit (and focus on the speech is to focus on positioning and positioning on the sound on the logos). The focus on writing is the focus on the body (and focus on writing is the concentration on writing). If dismantling concentrated on writing, and if the concentration on writing means focusing on writing, then can be defined dismantling as a rejection of the primacy of the Spirit and the power of the medium, and it is a challenge to what is moral, it is immersion in the earthly life, it means the disappearance of the Lord ... Is it convincing to say that disassembly Nihilistic nihilistic? Can be said that these assertions are correct, the answer to the above questions is "yes" for everything he says Derrida, and all what it meant dismantling. I will return to this issue after studying the terms which are working in Derrida's Deconstruction tools.
After the presentation of Derrida's metaphysical and theological basis of the concepts of speech and writing, he proceeded to examine the issue of verbal description of the language and concepts that are trying to build the description. In fact, Derrida was a reaction to the theory of Saussure, which says that the mark linguistic sign is the unity of signifier and signified. Claims Linguistics modern, based on the concept of signifier and signified, and structural, which condemns the concept, they have made the study of language and did Monetary fields Marafien scientists, and between Derrida that this claim is to deceive as because the concept of signifier and signified in language that reached us from the linguistics is the image of of the concept of the traditional speech and writing. Derrida has noted during his presentation of the relationship between metaphysics and theology, as follows:
Always suggests the concept of the mark within the same difference between signifier and signified ... so that was appealing against that they are two sides of one coin, and for this reason, keep this concept in the heritage of the concept of concentration on the Logos, which is in fact concentrated on the sound: absolute convergence between voice and Asot and the entity being, and the voice and the meaning of Being and ideal meaning. (OG, p. 112)
For this reason, the pattern language that is said to have made a scientific linguistics and structural borrowed enthusiastically as a model for cash, is in fact the same old pattern, any pattern "logos on the concentration - concentration on the Sound," which is the product of metaphysics.
It is clear that Derrida's gathering of metaphysics and linguistics in one box and this means that metaphysics opens the way for Verbal to imagine the phenomenon of language in the light of the bipolar, meaning that the concepts of the metaphysical notion of realism and idealism, the concept of body and spirit, the concept of good and evil opens the way for verbal and enabled him to perception of language in the light of bipolarity similar. The argument for verbal gaffes, which says that the image audio conjures up the concept (ie, the signifier evokes meaning), focused on the priority of the spoken word to written word, and in this regard, linguistics, structuralism is a modified form of neglect of traditional writing, that neglect caused by the reluctance of philosophical and metaphysical of nature of the external, visual, and embodied the written word, and is therefore clear that the concept behind the traditional language, and the concept behind the brand of tongue when Saussure ambushed metaphysics in the form of conditionality strong force.
He was Derrida called "vulgar concept of writing" on the concept of writing, which neglected the concept of language, traditional and modern linguistics, and several secondary concept, ie, nothing that does not exist only for the purpose of the representation of sound embodied in writing. He adds that the belief that prevailed in the western heritage is about to write it "character" and "visual pattern" and "the body and the article" Foreign Affairs in the logos. This is a banal concept specifically. The rejection of Derrida's concept vulgar, who was brought to our understanding of the language, although we were not aware of him completely, as the face of our performance in the field of literary criticism through us to believe that everything derive meaning and gives it only when linked to an idea, which should be linked to , in contrast, the idea of another, and so forth, so that these ideas are brought together in our idea of Being condescending This is why our idea of Being transcendent function as the idea of controlling our thoughts on language, and ideas in cash ... Thus the criticism of poem discovery of meaning ... as that given by is an idea or concept can be linked to the idea again, and will consolidate the process of linking some of the other ideas in our understanding of being condescending. It should be noted that all the fragments of ideas that can be woven in the pattern of one, collected by a single center represents our idea of the transcendent Being The pattern suggests that there is likelihood of the total. Can be defined in principle the idea that the collective entity which is the creativity of metaphysics. Derrida has been trying to edit our understanding of the language and criticism of this act of collective influence exercised by metaphysics, and reached a liberalization process through the formulation of new terms is possible that the ancient medical concept of language and the way the old currency. But our minds were subjected to the requirements of the traditional understanding of language, whether we were aware of that understanding or not. When we claim we are, we formulated the new ideas we did not do, in fact, but the transformation of old ideas. For example, the linguistic terminology that was brought by Saussure, which is said to have revolutionized our understanding of the language is the product of another metaphysics; we repeat ourselves when we say that the format of the new scientific language. And the right that it is possible to generate new ideas when the mind is neutral. The intent behind Derrida's view of the metaphysical basis of language and currency is paid to the neutrality of our minds that we are fully aware that an entirely natural phenomenon an example of language to hide the seeds of metaphysics, and even a scientific explanation for the language by Saussure is in fact a victim of metaphysics. Derrida has been initiated since the introduction of metaphysical foundation upon which stand the language, terminology in the formulation of which can generate a new understanding of the language .. These two steps are dismantling the structure. Now I will start as a deconstructionist terminology and correct them.
Was based on the concept of writing the new drafted by Derrida to three words are very complex: the difference difference and impact trace and write the original [first] (14) arche - writing. I will work on the interpretation of each term of these terms of the three broadest possible allowed by the determinants of this project, and how I will lead by these terms to do disassembly. The difference refers to the two actions actions: 1 that is different, not to be similar "differ" 2 to postpone and postpone (15) (11) "defer". It should be pointed out that the first and second spatial spatial temporal temporal. In the view of Derrida that every sign of leading this dual function: the difference and deferral, which is why the structure of the mark still required by the difference and deferral, and not through the signifier and signified, in the sense that the structure of the mark is the difference, which means that the mark is something that is similar to another sign, and something does not exist in the mark at all. This can be illustrated by example of what we said the following: we distinguish between the words three [means three] and tree [mean tree] (16) in speech and writing, they are completely different and revolutions reveal their identity. This is one of the two differences of the two in each tab. The other force in the tag is its ability to delay, ie, its ability to delay. For example, the word "rose" in the poem does not begin to disclose the meaning only when we realize that it is not a flower that we see in reality, but to have something else, something that should be detected. For this reason, the half full mark and the other half is inadequate, and this fact is necessary for the beginning of our understanding, it was not sufficient due to lack of it. As emphasized by Saussure, the tag is not a "signifier + signified" but the mark is "difference + delay". Saussure believes that the mark in the Union when he sees Derrida's difference.
Since the label is inadequate and incomplete so it should be understood as "under the cancellation [erase]" under erasure, a term coined by Derrida to point to the inadequacy of marks and the lack thereof. It is written, but with that write-offs, we Ncdobaa to point to the lack of it. For this reason, each carrying a sign that reference them. For example, the word "visible" used by the above did not carry any clear indication of it, but a sign nonetheless. But if we look at from the angle Deconstruction they will then sign written off, as follows: "visible". It should not take the idea of finishing the mark on the more literal, but in a manner suggestive only. This suggests a lack of Diagonal cut marks and inadequate, but inconclusive. There is no sign we can say about it D for something eternal, it does not have any absolute value, as it does not transmit anything transcendent .. Valalamp contextual contextual, meaning it creates a mirage, but the bulk of what you can do it send us in search of what you need is a mechanism and a reminder of what an object is not there. That is why the label "effect", it is not the visual representation or written perceived picture sound but the effect described by Derrida that is not normal (ie, it is not a reference or tag or natural indicator index in the sense Alhosrli), rather than culturally, and it is not physically rather than psychologically, and it is not biologically rather than spiritually.
What is an object in the brand drives the mind towards what is not an object where, and for this reason, what is in the tag carries the impact of what is therein, and you can mark the families of the mind, because it can remind us of what is not found it, and you can cross a reminder stimulus mind and paid to the Movement. Thus we say that the impact of the mark, and is in effect are driven differences and deferrals. So it has become necessary to change the concept of writing with the emergence of the terms "difference" and "impact" as it is no longer able to maintain defined as "character" and "significant pattern" and "the body and the article" Foreign Affairs in the mind. When you try to explain Derrida's definition of writing, saying: "... It's inscription inscription in general, whether literally or not literally, even if what was distributed in the space away from the sound system ..."( OG, p. 9) (17 ). In this sense, we can film and dance, ballet, music, sculpture, all in writing. Derrida has noted in expanding the concept of this writing that:
One also might talk about writing sports (any sport in general) or write to military or political in the light of the techniques that control these areas now. This does not describe the pattern associated with the significance of these secondary activities, but also describes the nature of these activities itself and its content. (OG, p. 9
Magazine for "horizon"
Jacques Derrida and the theory of deconstruction (2)
The language itself is to write within that meaning (GO, p. 8). It was noted Gaetari Spivak Gayatri Spivak that: "One thing carries within it the effect of changing the eternal, ie, the structure of self, with the intention of the mark. Called Derrida on this structure the name of" writing "(1. Stated Spivak note the following summing up of the concept of writing:" Thus, we find that the writing is the name of the structure that has always inhabited by the impact. This is a broader concept than the concept of the experimental book, which refers to the format indication of the substance of the experimental material "(OG, p. xxxix).
He was named Derrida's "Writing original" on the difference between the concept of writing this and the concept of writing vulgar narrow. Writing original works in expressions written and non-biblical. And write in a narrow sense is written based graphic concept Jerafim which is in fact D exchange. In theory, Derrida's deconstruction, which select the dimensions, it has become a recipe written for a different meaning for meaning which has been marketed in the traditional use. It could be argued that the written form is graphe "The impact of Emtemoss (19) institutionalized" (GO, p. 46).
Has become a deconstructionist theory to guide towards concentration on writing and include a broad indication, because of Alemtemoss, and for this reason, the change caused by Derrida did not change the importance enjoyed by the concept of speech on the concept of writing, as it comes to the traditional understanding of these terms. It suggests concentration on writing, as defined by Derrida, to go the route of understanding, pushing the mind to imagine the post-impact kind of definition, all of which are going awareness or perception. Effect of showing his work in the form of Portrait (photo card), and the poster (the poster) and the name of science, and gesture and the spoken word and the written word, and others. The concentration on writing new understanding of the function of the impact. I imagine when my mind starts photograph or cognitive work I wanted to understand the significance of the photo, is a non-flammable material mind. Valzhn move in search of something far from what exists in the image (ie, search for something behind the ghostly imprint on the image), and that is the function of the difference. While the Phantom is the footprint impact. As the impact itself does not exist (GO, p. 167). Can be defined concentration on writing that this perception, the new that something, something absent, had left its mark (mark phantom) on the topics that create particular movements in the mind (and those fingerprints Phantom is the impact). Begins with the impact to work through differences and delay (difference + delay = Brother "T" Love) (20).
Are displayed in the traditional concept of language as a legend .. He was involved in it something mystical [Sophie]: such as near the sound of the meaning, and others. We note that the item is an item of Internal metaphysical, metaphysics was controlled on our perception of language. Derrida has coined the new terms and the form of new concepts to an understanding of the language consists of a liberal concept of metaphysics. For this reason, The liberalization of understanding the language of metaphysics to remove ambiguity and confusion, as they are to get rid of the mysterious element completely. The removal of ambiguity is in fact remove the Ostrp (legendary character) also (21). It is right to say that the elimination of the dismantling of what is mystical and remove Alostrp in the traditional understanding of the language.
Have involved this study for dismantling the three phases, first phase consisted in shedding light on the concepts of speech and writing, and included the two central processing units, namely: the reason that lies behind the belief that says the primacy of speech and the priority to write, and how well the dimension and its relation to metaphysics in effect. And studied in the second stage claim lingual view of modern linguistics that add character to the scientific study of language and made it a field scientifically. Consisted issues are its central, which had been considered at this stage to confirm that the concept lingual of the mark is another image of the traditional concept of speech and writing, and that the linguistics of modern is the victim of metaphysics, comprising the third stage of the description terms Derrida and evaluation: The difference, impact and original writing. Has been highlighted by the significance of the term concentration on writing from the perspective of Derrida.
Based on the above, has changed our understanding of the language, what is the fate of the criticism? Starts with the answer to this question on the assumption that literature is a form of writing, though the poem or story or any literary work is the structure of the effects .. Those effects that we know the hallmarks of ghost do not know what it is but we are confident of the entity and existence. The criticism, which is known as primarily a search word, line, text, or anything that moves the mind from the point of perception specific to the worlds of research together with a strong motive to interpretation, it begins doubt, suspicion, based on persuasion. Critic doubted the appearance of the tag (such as word, line, and the story of the statue, image and Portrita, ... etc.) because it has convinced that the fact that it appears to him is not everything, but there is something else, we are not satisfied with things as they are, but we want to search in. The incursion beyond its borders to discover the secrets because we feel that there is something missing or something is absent from what we imagined and we know physically, and that this eternal feeling that there is something missing or absent is the original writing. Literature is one of the types of speech writing for the original, while the drawing is another kind, and music is also another kind, and works in the effects of original writing in the subjects. The effects is like a foot print .. It is the one who walked on the sand? We walked one and left behind the effects of his feet in every place, and all the prints left behind it only reminds us that it is missing and absent. Can be defined as original writing as our understanding of the fact that it is missing, and it is absent, and accompanied by a sense of the suffering generated by the experience, which discern their inability to detect the absent despite the silence applied or Anva blatant, every fingerprint left by behind him are the effects as they are confirmed to attend This is absent in spite of his absence, the position of Fayala really weird! (And perhaps the diagnosis - that is to give personal qualities on non-rational - version of the simplification, but it may help to understand).
He used the traditional exchange impressions with an idea through the confrontation with the literary work, and this is why the criticism of the poem discovery of meaning. Therefore, the meaning of an idea or concept can be attached to the idea of another concept or another and we continue this placement to latch onto these ideas in the idea of transcendent entity or transcendent truth. But we are not aware of the fact that what we call "meaning" is in fact the idea of metaphysics take refuge. Has not escaped the structural, which is said to be a revolutionary process, from the grip of metaphysics, but to say that the structural layout suggests, means that there is a center somewhere, and that the center is the central concept, which can be detected as the concept of transcendental entity or authority. This suggests the concept of pattern that everything on the concept of best, or that it is subject to at least understand, Where found format eliminates the confusion or obfuscation. And confirm that the dismantling of these illusions, as they all are claiming that the truth or entity is a "fabrication" and nothing else. These words represent Fberkat huge point to a failure in our search for meaning, and this means in some stage of the history of the search for meaning, the researchers announced, for one reason or another, they got to the last possible point of their research and that it should not do any research other than this point , and the purpose of protecting what they called the "final point" of the humiliation that can be attributed to them for future research, attributed to that point, a kind of sacred and named it the truth or the truth of Being, or being anything else. Has worked the final search point or concept in the Bible the center of criticism of both types of traditional and structural. Therefore, there was a great fool walked on guided our cash and our understanding of the language.
These comments do not suggest that what has been written is pure fiction? I believe that the dismantling suggests so. This includes our holy books too! (In fact, disassembly is not recognized something called a book, but the texts only). What about the concept of "Lord" then? The fate of the other concepts that innumerable such as: the source origin, truth and being and the transcendent reality and ... Etc.? That Derrida does not deny the existence of God, but he wondered, as indirectly, for our understanding of God and its relevance, and perhaps we use the term "Lord" god to refer to the god of a particular system of defense for the protection of the concept of source and truth of Being and similar terms. What is the real source of true or truth which should be sought therein. This may be the concepts behind the scope of human comprehension. May be the world the truth, or God, a world forbidden to humans who can not do anything Bizaih only imagine, or configure the meaning of Wah him at best. He was the absence of the Supreme Being Supreme and doubt, and that this sense of absence and longing for the presence of the original writing, but the hallmarks of the absent presence, which we know is everywhere impact. Through Derrida sought to view the metaphysical foundation upon which our understanding of the language, and try to edit our understanding of metaphysics, Derrida began to topple religions which sits in the kingdoms of the language. They accounted for religions and immunities provided protection to the concepts of metaphysics. However, it should recognize that Derrida suggests, indirectly, that the Lord behind all humanitarian concepts and verbal processors. It should be emphasized at this point in particular that Derrida does not indicate anything alarming, it is free to adopt the research methodology in the field of knowledge, trying to free the mind from the pressures and controls that were imposed in the name of God or religions. Derrida leads us strongly to rethink the source or truth through the presentation of the mind to the new freedom in the search, which is why Derrida and controversies involving his arguments on the spiritual implications.
Finally, I should return to the issue of cash. It was cash, in the traditional sense, in application of the model aims to understand a literary work, and this model may be philosophically or morally, religiously or linguistically. It is likely that the critic is not fully aware of the fact that it applies the particular model, what we call "self evaluation" is in reality a non-autonomous, we catch what is in the literary work something in the process of that understanding which leads to the calendar. It is possible that this "something" is a literary style, which gave the words and acts, actions and phenomena, the possibility of generating meaning. For example, if you tried to explain the poem The Lake Isle of Innisfree, will be able to, either by linking the content of the poem available information concerning the life of the poet ... that information pertaining to temperament and Kapth and musings in the nature of a rapidly changing, and the speed the demise of the beautiful things, the "anguish" of the gains material and his passion for life dreamy. Then I start to link these ideas in the poem of these ideas work in the external format to connect the ideas in the poem. For that reason, the ideas that abound in the poem is meaningful only when I proceed the process of linking these ideas to what is outside the poem. In addition, I may never look into the cause of depression causes of the poet and his love of life dreamy, and causes him to hate material gains. We note in this kind of criticism that the focus not be on the format itself, since the focus on the format to study the same pattern leads us to the structural. For example: What's the significance of the literary left home the President and going to the island? Is there Mgxiat other? Answer: Yes, certainly. And in some characters of Shakespeare comedy, such as the play "As You Like It" and "Night's Dream Midsummer" that the characters leave the city to Aizp forest where the resolution of conflicts and the spread of wisdom, and along these lines, a number of characters in the poems and novels that leave the city towards the isolated islands For example, the personality of "Prospero" in the play "Storm" and personal "Jelevr" in the novel "Jelevr flights." For this reason, we find that the desire of the poet Yeats to resort to the island of Innisfree desire to emulate the former book. We recognize that we understand the poem, we are familiar with this conviction, any conviction to leave the city and Mbahjha and resort to the island with great meaning in poetry, because there are convinced literary or agreement literary that this idea is the meaning of what, and so we find that can structural analysis to focus on other elements of the poem in order to study poetic style. Has been applied in the first example, any example of the application is not structural, certain models recognized in the literature on the poem only to understand the poem. In the second example, any example of structural explanation, used the poem and the elements to study the pattern poetry or literature to study the models accepted. It should be noted here that the dismantling is not any of these cases, or Nqeidahma.
Dismantlement critic does not give any examples, do not apply to any model of literary texts, but it destroys all the existing models do not provide any form, but writing this has caused dissociation of considerable uncertainty. Unlike the structural exchange does not believe in the existence of deconstructive criticism can be understood format. The pattern suggests the idea that things regularly or make them possible as well, but that this idea is really a source of consolation, we prefer the comfort of the uncertainty. In spite of the sympathy that may involve deception, but better than the suffering of the confusion. Announced structural, when confronted with the problem of complexity of the literature and minds behind the literary works of that complexity is subject to analysis and can be understood, and alleged a pattern could explain moral complications. It is an affirmation that will make the structural alleged this claim. Vabannioip is the assertion of human will and ability to solve it is complex, and on the contrary, looking into the possibility of disassembly lines, wondering about her and how that came in the traditions and moral standards to exist. Confrontation between human consciousness and coordinated the mark is so complex that difficult to understand. For this reason, confirms the dismantling, according to what is mentioned in David Allison David Allison, the need to rethink the whole problem of language (22). It may be necessary to have a new field of knowledge assets used words [Altothel] etymology and psychology together in one discipline to perform this task. We note here that the dismantling of discarded metaphysics and philosophy as the patterns of perception deceptive, as the linguistics which was concealing metaphysics in their models of language, not suitable for disassembly. Also do not resort to the dismantling of structural, which is based strongly on linguistics.
It may seem dismantling a field governed by rules and regulations of a particular language is difficult for the novice to understand, but the reality is different. We have rules and regulations and language, particularly in the more traditional monetary theories than in the disassembly. Valambtdi faces many technical terms such as character, plot, Thimp, image, code, lyric poetry, Sonitp, and ... Etc., have been utilized by over and over again the extent that they become normal because of it. Moreover, we did not understand that terminology such as "different", "impact", "authentic writing", ... Etc., we are not able to understand and accommodate any written work is part of this theory because it is difficult to understand anything new. However, one can benefit from learning this theory considerably if the Voltage first. These are interest we wonder the relevance of human understanding and his world and knowledge. Dismantling and cast Dia on our new property. Tells us that the power of language is not derived from the authority of literature and the pace of language because the power of language, like the authority of music, painting, sculpture, and ritual ... Etc., derived from a primitive sense of something missing and genuine absent, and direct human perception then.
Footnotes:
(1) This article was translated from a book (structural and disassembly) by S.. Ravindran, Structuralism & Deconstruction. By: S. Ravindran. (Translated)
(2) known as Jacques Derrida the term in his book "In Algramatologgio" [in the science of writing] that the study of literature and letters of the alphabet and clips of words and reading and writing, "saying it was based on the definition of Itre Littre, and that he did not find this term in this century, except in Gelb Gelb book titled "Lesson in Writing: Principles Algramatologgio" A Study of Writing: The Foundations of Grammatology (1952) / d. Mohammed Anani: terminology modern literary / author and symbolize a symbol OG. (translated)
(3) m. E. Abrams, "Angel deconstructive" Journal of Monetary Research 3 (1977), p. 428.
(4) Newton Garver, a prelude to the book "Sound and the phenomenon" (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), p. xxii. Garver shows, commenting on the status of logic and theory in the philosophy of language, saying: "We find in the history of Western philosophy, the philosophy of language - including a lot of metaphysics - has adopted the logic than by rhetoric" (Preface, p. xi). But he made clear in his comment on the movements, which occurred in the latter part of the nineteenth century and the first part of the twentieth century, said: "It was the first movement to promote the philosophy of language-based reasoning, however, said the group had followed had been the destruction of that heritage, destructive talk about Derrida as the closing of the Metaphysics "(Preface, p. xii).
5 (c). Hillis Miller, "Critic, adding," Journal of Monetary Research j 3 (1977), p. 41.
(6) Murray Krieger, "Theory of Criticism" (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), p. 220-243.
(7) Frederic Jameson, "prison house of language" (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972), p. 176.
("I have been accompanied by coordinated language writing phonetic alphabet, so the format that generated a metaphysics based on the Logos, which defines the meaning of Being as the audience. This has been a concentration on the logos ringing always persecuted for reasons far removed from the reflection in the origin of writing and the place of ... . "(Jacques Derrida, in his" writing "When Giatri Chapraforte Spivak - Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), p. 43, quotations have been attached to the symbol (OG).
(9) has explained Jacques Derrida in his commentary on the background metaphysical concept of signifier - signified, saying: "This major difference between signifier and signified to the era, the other included the history of metaphysics, if we look at the issue from a narrow perspective and implicitly, but if we force perspective is even more we will consider in an era finiteness of creation and the Christian concepts that fit Greco "(OG, p. 13).
(10) uses Derrida's term logocentric (concentration on the logos), sometimes, rather than the term phonocentric (concentration on the sound) to refer to systems of thought, or habits of thought based on what he calls Bmitaveziqa attendance, a term that he found when Heidegger meant by the belief that there is center outside the text or outside the language to ensure the health of the meaning without it be challenged or search the truth (d. Mohammed Anani: modern literary terms). The Gaber Asfour recalled (the age of structural / edited by Edith Kirzuil / p. 274) that the Greeks the word logos refers to the floor that reflect the internal thought, or thought the same procedure. When referring Derrida to concentrate on the logos (which is interpreted by the bird to "the centrality of logos") is wanting to destroy the impact of overwhelming, and the destruction of the principle of fixed asset per, and coupled with the principle of finality or attic, and confirm the importance of writing that will not become a follower, but the first place. (Translated)
(11) possible to know about the positioning of logos Balmitaveziqa, because both expression of the desire proper sense. And find meaning in the logos on the concentration of all in the mind of the Logos, a word that reflects the mind of God.
(12) represents a concentration on the sound rejection of writing as a technology only. As well as the convergence of assurance spoken word phrase. The word is written not only serves as the meaning of the words.
(13) "launched this movement, which he calls the" form closed "based on the logos of the views of traditional or classical language (which confirms that they are based are Being transcendent Platonic, Christian, or attendance, which guarantees the meanings), to what I call" model based on writing " attendance, which is to serve as a "fingerprint on the white" (m. e. Abrams, "(Angel deconstructive", p. 429).
(14) Write First: The expression is derived from Freud, has used it to refer to the unconscious when he noticed a game for children include the impact of writing on the left after removing the wax paper. Derrida has used this concept, referring to Freud several times in his book "Writing and difference." He says: "The writing is a continuation of perception even before conscious awareness of itself. And memory or write is initiated the process awareness of awareness itself. The" perceived "it can be read only in the past, under the perception and beyond." (D. Mohammed Anani / modern literary terms). (Translated)
(15) Murray Krieger says that the key to the debate about the word difference (ie brother "T" Love) are playing on the French word which means differ involved in the following two: (1) to differ (which differ not like) (2) to defer (defer any or delay) depending on the difference between the various entities present (difference) and similar entities, one present and the other is absent between them a gap of time (delay). There are some aspects of deception in the "differance is that (a) inaudible but visible, and that the term may not correspond to any word, and thus it only serves to help remember the word that vary them, are not present in the concept of Abbaas different from themselves. (Theory Cash from 0.228 to 231).
(16) whilst the initial "rich" and pronounced the second "see" (translated).
(17) Derrida demonstrates in "writing and difference", saying: "Writing is one of the shapes that represent the overall impact, the same effect" (OG, p. 167). "The idea is that the impact could be subject to question the essence Aloonto - phenomenal ontophenomenological. Is the effect of nothing, which is not an entity, but it is beyond question that says:" What is? "(OG, p. 65).
(1 Giatri Spivak, a prelude to the book in his "writing" of Jacques Derrida (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), p. xxxix.
(19) Altoss: The term refers to the process that turns the standards and values and behavior patterns consistent. (Structural era / edited by Edith Kirzuil / translation Gaber Asfour / Dar Afaq Arabia for printing and publishing / 1985 / p. 277). (Translated)
(20) should pay attention to that Derrida derives the word difference differance to combine the difference difference (in the sense that the similarity) + deference (ie delay, according to the meaning of impact), which was replaced by the letter (e) in a different letter (a) seems to be different and clear this word but it is difficult to explain it until he was transferred to Arabic to the translator deliberately "writing and difference" Kadhim Jihad to develop a V characters between Mekovin small. (Translated)
(21) reflect the note C, Hillis Miller, the language attitude Tvkikia: "The language from the outset, imaginary and illusory and offset from any direct referral to the things as they are. And should be detained the human condition in a web of words intertwined over the centuries is rich in myths, concepts and measurements metaphysical in short, the whole pattern of Western metaphysics "(" Heritage and difference ") in the magazine" Dayakerteix "2.4 (1972), 11).
(22) David Allison, the introduction of the book "Sound and the phenomenon," p. xxxvii - vii i
Is the dismantling of a devastating right? If yes, how to be and why? If the answer is no, then why this fear? Can not answer these questions only after understanding the concepts of dismantling basic and evaluation, and perhaps the best place from which we can achieve our goal is a book in his "writing" (2) Grammatology Of who is a San dismantling ... the outstanding work done by Jacques Derrida, the philosopher and critic of France.
I believe that research that explores Derrida and his theory of deconstruction faced obstacles main points, the first created by the method of Derrida himself characterized by raising uncertainty as well as the terminology and concepts, while the other is a series of critical views which are interpretations of interpretations are inadequate or ill-interpretations misinterpretations possible, although light wielded by some of the difficult concepts that form Derrida. And I'm going to document some of these critical comments as before and evaluate the concepts of disassembly.
PM stresses. E. M. Abrams H. Abrams to highlight the part of Derrida's theory is: "1 that the transfer consideration of the language to writing, written or printed text, 2 he sees the text in a specific way unusual" (3). Abrams did not intentionally to simplify the status of Derrida as Tvkikia through Abannioyen equated with the other French, but was marred to a great extent when he tried to identify some key words in deconstructive criticism such as "writing" ecriture and "text" text. He showed that when Derrida's writing is the printed text or written that the concept of a specific text in a way unusual.
I will prove in the course of my evaluation of Derrida and my comment was that what was stated by Abrams, nothing more than a handful of bad interpretations that did not tell us what the dismantling of things, but has not been to the dismantling of an onion.
The Newton Garver, Newton Garvar is another commentator on Derrida, as it emphasizes that Derrida is one of the philosophers of language, and it emphasizes the primacy of rhetoric to logic:
Derrida subsumed under the banner of the movement that looks at the impact that play Almlfozat utterances in the speech that it represents the actual nature of language and meaning, which, because this is the logic of justification Mstenbta rhetoric (4).
The received argument that says that the dismantling of a discipline rhetorical, with the support Hillis Miller, who says: "The dismantling search legacy bequeathed by the metaphor and the concept and the narrative in each other, and this is why the dismantling of cognitive rhetorical field" (5). Murray believes Krieger Murray Krieger that Derrida's "structural cash to overcome the structural and coerced, and may have been negated as well," adding that the attack by Derrida is "a form more recent attack, the old attack Plato the poet as a creator of myths" (6). Emphasizes Frederic Jameson Fredric Jemson Derrida denies that thought they overcome metaphysics and escape from the old model for the purpose of screening new and undiscovered (7).
It is possible that these comments are a source of misleading if the enumerated data or evaluated properly to the theory of Derrida, despite its usefulness in the process of research in disassembly, we when we Derrida with the rest of the philosophers of language who think that the logic derived from the rhetoric, this means to block the possibility of awareness of modern ideas, and the equality of Derrida's Plato and emphasized that Derrida reiterates long-standing dispute with the legendary myth is an insult to the status of Derrida, and emphasized that Derrida did not do anything but to take the attention from the "speak" to "writing" Thus, the inventory of the text in the cell particular, is misinterpretation really. The one should be cautious when approaching the secondary sources to understand Derrida and deconstruction. The split critics groups ... Either they fail to understand Derrida or abuse interpret his ideas, and for this reason can not invoke Article secondary, can not we prepare roads impassable to reach the world of disassembly, but that there Other critics like Harold Bloom, Harold Bloom and Hillis Miller and Paul de Man Paul DeMan and Jeffrey Hartmann Jeoffrey Hartman, who are as far as the authenticity of Derrida, but that each one of them is almost a school and rarely explains Derrida ... great teacher for dismantlement. The understanding of Derrida's first step towards understanding the disassembly, and is no doubt that the first step requires overzealous ideas of Derrida.
Can say that the theory of deconstruction need a lot of new analysis and any attempt by any critic is trying to analyze this theory does not need to dismantle the definition necessarily because such a complex theoretical and complex that defies definition. On the contrary, one can attempt to explain the basic terminology created by Derrida to destroy the critical tradition and to facilitate the act of dismantling ... and this is the first step which I will here, and my intention After describing the terminology and analysis that came out Derrida's answer to the question to how to enable the dismantling of the re- literary criticism, and I will in the final stages of analysis that what was described as absurd is not as well but the dismantling of the contents of the spiritual.
It is worth mentioning that the "writing" and "speak" words that Axial can begin by understanding. Enjoy these words, especially in terms of traditional concepts of language, as these concepts provide for the primacy of speech and the priority over the writing, although the spoken word "voice" phone word of Foreign Affairs and has the ability to self-erasure. As you know, the spoken word as one voice (audio) and the function is invoking the concept represented by the ultrasound. Fade and the spoken word audio or image in the process of invoking the concept, which is why they put out the same as the indication in the process of demonstrating the significance of which he is more important than anything else. Can not imagine this meaning only through ultrasound, which is indicative. It is possible to note here that there is something like the Trinity in this relationship: the mind of mankind, dal (ultrasound), meaning (concept).
Now, what the place occupied by the written word in the traditional understanding of the language? Proceeding from the traditional concept of a language known written word as a representation of the written to the spoken word: In this regard, it is D the spoken word ... and so on, "the written word is D. Dahl is secondary to the spoken word" can not do the written word of anything other than the representation of the spoken word while that the spoken word is the signifier. If I wanted to evoke the concept of "flower" I should then uttering a voice, "flower" (Flowers e), and is indicative of the ultrasound image or audio. But when I write the word "flower" What is the only representation of ultrasound through the structure of written graphic structure. Are not connected with this picture in any written relevant concept, but the picture is written can not represent the concept to the structure of it visible to the visual image as non-vocal, it's something like a spectrum. Is secondary to ultrasound can be neglected, but must be neglected.
It should be noted here that the traditional arguments that were attributed to a secondary position to the written word and place of the President of the spoken word is the metaphysical and theological arguments (. Derrida wrote in his commentary on the metaphysical basis upon which the concept of the spoken word, saying:
.... The understanding of God is the other name for logos logos as self-presence. It is possible that an infinite self and present, can also be generated through voice as a self-prescription. It is an arrangement which can be indicative of the self from which to borrow from outside itself indicative of the overwhelming influence at the same time. As well as the case with the audio experience, celebrating the experience and announces itself as the exclusion of writing, in other words, the exclusion of D "outer", "significant", "spatial" which impede the self-presence (9).
Derrida stresses that the concepts of speech and writing traditional "transmitting to the outside of the meaning" (10) logocentric, and this is another important term used by Derrida to mean what metaphysics is a vector or a vector is a theological (11). To be more precise I would like to point out that the concepts of speech and writing and may be formed by Achtrtthma and controlled by metaphysics. The truth is that this "concentration on the logos" is "centered on the sound" phonocentrism .. This belief, which believes that the sound almost transcendent reality (12) transcendental. We find that the theory of Derrida's positioning on the logos, and concentration on the sound are terms different represent a single phenomenon: evolution metaphysical metaphysical genesis of the concept of speech and understanding. It focuses on the positioning of the logos, and concentration on the sound on the sound, because these two concepts Itoldan of the belief that that sound has been mediating between the human mind and the transcendent reality. It could be argued that this argument for the concept of the Indian approach to the authority of the mantras. Which could be defined as "a sound or series of votes. We believe that the voice of authority because we believe that it can raise power condescending; it due importance to the tone of the words that Nntgaha ... How can the voice of a certain word we call them" mantra "Be in possession of power? It enjoy this privilege because we believe that the sound works as an intermediary between the logos, and transcendent authority. and I'm not trying here to confirm that the traditional Western concept of private stationed on the Logos, concentration on sound is the same concept to your mantra, but I assure there are similarities.
We note in dismantling that there is another element in "concentration on writing" graphocentrism, a term important needed explanation before entering into the theory of Derrida. It is possible to begin to say that writing writing writing graphic, and Jerafim grapheme is the letter in the alphabet, or as the total letters or groups of craft that could indicate Alfonim phoneme (which can be defined as the smallest unit of speech marked Mlfoza or a word of spoken last or other word in language). And if we know that writing can therefore be written to say that Jerafim, according to what is mentioned in the traditional concept, D exchange intended to write unit does not have any connection, except it represents the ultrasound. For this reason, we can say that the intention to write about themselves in the midst is the transmission of the importance of speech to write, which represents a reversal of the concept of the traditional view that the priority of speech or the spoken word on the writing or the written word.
There are a number of critics believe that the dismantling of which was brought by Derrida is a shift from concentration on the logos to be concentrated on writing (13), and this is not the Note is innocent and must express their meaning by dragging out the explanation, I believe that the best way to clarify this issue is to try to simplify the matter by measurement. If it can be compared with writing and speaking and the concept they represent, body, spirit and the transcendent reality, then the focus is on speech is to focus on the Spirit (and focus on the speech is to focus on positioning and positioning on the sound on the logos). The focus on writing is the focus on the body (and focus on writing is the concentration on writing). If dismantling concentrated on writing, and if the concentration on writing means focusing on writing, then can be defined dismantling as a rejection of the primacy of the Spirit and the power of the medium, and it is a challenge to what is moral, it is immersion in the earthly life, it means the disappearance of the Lord ... Is it convincing to say that disassembly Nihilistic nihilistic? Can be said that these assertions are correct, the answer to the above questions is "yes" for everything he says Derrida, and all what it meant dismantling. I will return to this issue after studying the terms which are working in Derrida's Deconstruction tools.
After the presentation of Derrida's metaphysical and theological basis of the concepts of speech and writing, he proceeded to examine the issue of verbal description of the language and concepts that are trying to build the description. In fact, Derrida was a reaction to the theory of Saussure, which says that the mark linguistic sign is the unity of signifier and signified. Claims Linguistics modern, based on the concept of signifier and signified, and structural, which condemns the concept, they have made the study of language and did Monetary fields Marafien scientists, and between Derrida that this claim is to deceive as because the concept of signifier and signified in language that reached us from the linguistics is the image of of the concept of the traditional speech and writing. Derrida has noted during his presentation of the relationship between metaphysics and theology, as follows:
Always suggests the concept of the mark within the same difference between signifier and signified ... so that was appealing against that they are two sides of one coin, and for this reason, keep this concept in the heritage of the concept of concentration on the Logos, which is in fact concentrated on the sound: absolute convergence between voice and Asot and the entity being, and the voice and the meaning of Being and ideal meaning. (OG, p. 112)
For this reason, the pattern language that is said to have made a scientific linguistics and structural borrowed enthusiastically as a model for cash, is in fact the same old pattern, any pattern "logos on the concentration - concentration on the Sound," which is the product of metaphysics.
It is clear that Derrida's gathering of metaphysics and linguistics in one box and this means that metaphysics opens the way for Verbal to imagine the phenomenon of language in the light of the bipolar, meaning that the concepts of the metaphysical notion of realism and idealism, the concept of body and spirit, the concept of good and evil opens the way for verbal and enabled him to perception of language in the light of bipolarity similar. The argument for verbal gaffes, which says that the image audio conjures up the concept (ie, the signifier evokes meaning), focused on the priority of the spoken word to written word, and in this regard, linguistics, structuralism is a modified form of neglect of traditional writing, that neglect caused by the reluctance of philosophical and metaphysical of nature of the external, visual, and embodied the written word, and is therefore clear that the concept behind the traditional language, and the concept behind the brand of tongue when Saussure ambushed metaphysics in the form of conditionality strong force.
He was Derrida called "vulgar concept of writing" on the concept of writing, which neglected the concept of language, traditional and modern linguistics, and several secondary concept, ie, nothing that does not exist only for the purpose of the representation of sound embodied in writing. He adds that the belief that prevailed in the western heritage is about to write it "character" and "visual pattern" and "the body and the article" Foreign Affairs in the logos. This is a banal concept specifically. The rejection of Derrida's concept vulgar, who was brought to our understanding of the language, although we were not aware of him completely, as the face of our performance in the field of literary criticism through us to believe that everything derive meaning and gives it only when linked to an idea, which should be linked to , in contrast, the idea of another, and so forth, so that these ideas are brought together in our idea of Being condescending This is why our idea of Being transcendent function as the idea of controlling our thoughts on language, and ideas in cash ... Thus the criticism of poem discovery of meaning ... as that given by is an idea or concept can be linked to the idea again, and will consolidate the process of linking some of the other ideas in our understanding of being condescending. It should be noted that all the fragments of ideas that can be woven in the pattern of one, collected by a single center represents our idea of the transcendent Being The pattern suggests that there is likelihood of the total. Can be defined in principle the idea that the collective entity which is the creativity of metaphysics. Derrida has been trying to edit our understanding of the language and criticism of this act of collective influence exercised by metaphysics, and reached a liberalization process through the formulation of new terms is possible that the ancient medical concept of language and the way the old currency. But our minds were subjected to the requirements of the traditional understanding of language, whether we were aware of that understanding or not. When we claim we are, we formulated the new ideas we did not do, in fact, but the transformation of old ideas. For example, the linguistic terminology that was brought by Saussure, which is said to have revolutionized our understanding of the language is the product of another metaphysics; we repeat ourselves when we say that the format of the new scientific language. And the right that it is possible to generate new ideas when the mind is neutral. The intent behind Derrida's view of the metaphysical basis of language and currency is paid to the neutrality of our minds that we are fully aware that an entirely natural phenomenon an example of language to hide the seeds of metaphysics, and even a scientific explanation for the language by Saussure is in fact a victim of metaphysics. Derrida has been initiated since the introduction of metaphysical foundation upon which stand the language, terminology in the formulation of which can generate a new understanding of the language .. These two steps are dismantling the structure. Now I will start as a deconstructionist terminology and correct them.
Was based on the concept of writing the new drafted by Derrida to three words are very complex: the difference difference and impact trace and write the original [first] (14) arche - writing. I will work on the interpretation of each term of these terms of the three broadest possible allowed by the determinants of this project, and how I will lead by these terms to do disassembly. The difference refers to the two actions actions: 1 that is different, not to be similar "differ" 2 to postpone and postpone (15) (11) "defer". It should be pointed out that the first and second spatial spatial temporal temporal. In the view of Derrida that every sign of leading this dual function: the difference and deferral, which is why the structure of the mark still required by the difference and deferral, and not through the signifier and signified, in the sense that the structure of the mark is the difference, which means that the mark is something that is similar to another sign, and something does not exist in the mark at all. This can be illustrated by example of what we said the following: we distinguish between the words three [means three] and tree [mean tree] (16) in speech and writing, they are completely different and revolutions reveal their identity. This is one of the two differences of the two in each tab. The other force in the tag is its ability to delay, ie, its ability to delay. For example, the word "rose" in the poem does not begin to disclose the meaning only when we realize that it is not a flower that we see in reality, but to have something else, something that should be detected. For this reason, the half full mark and the other half is inadequate, and this fact is necessary for the beginning of our understanding, it was not sufficient due to lack of it. As emphasized by Saussure, the tag is not a "signifier + signified" but the mark is "difference + delay". Saussure believes that the mark in the Union when he sees Derrida's difference.
Since the label is inadequate and incomplete so it should be understood as "under the cancellation [erase]" under erasure, a term coined by Derrida to point to the inadequacy of marks and the lack thereof. It is written, but with that write-offs, we Ncdobaa to point to the lack of it. For this reason, each carrying a sign that reference them. For example, the word "visible" used by the above did not carry any clear indication of it, but a sign nonetheless. But if we look at from the angle Deconstruction they will then sign written off, as follows: "visible". It should not take the idea of finishing the mark on the more literal, but in a manner suggestive only. This suggests a lack of Diagonal cut marks and inadequate, but inconclusive. There is no sign we can say about it D for something eternal, it does not have any absolute value, as it does not transmit anything transcendent .. Valalamp contextual contextual, meaning it creates a mirage, but the bulk of what you can do it send us in search of what you need is a mechanism and a reminder of what an object is not there. That is why the label "effect", it is not the visual representation or written perceived picture sound but the effect described by Derrida that is not normal (ie, it is not a reference or tag or natural indicator index in the sense Alhosrli), rather than culturally, and it is not physically rather than psychologically, and it is not biologically rather than spiritually.
What is an object in the brand drives the mind towards what is not an object where, and for this reason, what is in the tag carries the impact of what is therein, and you can mark the families of the mind, because it can remind us of what is not found it, and you can cross a reminder stimulus mind and paid to the Movement. Thus we say that the impact of the mark, and is in effect are driven differences and deferrals. So it has become necessary to change the concept of writing with the emergence of the terms "difference" and "impact" as it is no longer able to maintain defined as "character" and "significant pattern" and "the body and the article" Foreign Affairs in the mind. When you try to explain Derrida's definition of writing, saying: "... It's inscription inscription in general, whether literally or not literally, even if what was distributed in the space away from the sound system ..."( OG, p. 9) (17 ). In this sense, we can film and dance, ballet, music, sculpture, all in writing. Derrida has noted in expanding the concept of this writing that:
One also might talk about writing sports (any sport in general) or write to military or political in the light of the techniques that control these areas now. This does not describe the pattern associated with the significance of these secondary activities, but also describes the nature of these activities itself and its content. (OG, p. 9
Magazine for "horizon"
Jacques Derrida and the theory of deconstruction (2)
The language itself is to write within that meaning (GO, p. 8). It was noted Gaetari Spivak Gayatri Spivak that: "One thing carries within it the effect of changing the eternal, ie, the structure of self, with the intention of the mark. Called Derrida on this structure the name of" writing "(1. Stated Spivak note the following summing up of the concept of writing:" Thus, we find that the writing is the name of the structure that has always inhabited by the impact. This is a broader concept than the concept of the experimental book, which refers to the format indication of the substance of the experimental material "(OG, p. xxxix).
He was named Derrida's "Writing original" on the difference between the concept of writing this and the concept of writing vulgar narrow. Writing original works in expressions written and non-biblical. And write in a narrow sense is written based graphic concept Jerafim which is in fact D exchange. In theory, Derrida's deconstruction, which select the dimensions, it has become a recipe written for a different meaning for meaning which has been marketed in the traditional use. It could be argued that the written form is graphe "The impact of Emtemoss (19) institutionalized" (GO, p. 46).
Has become a deconstructionist theory to guide towards concentration on writing and include a broad indication, because of Alemtemoss, and for this reason, the change caused by Derrida did not change the importance enjoyed by the concept of speech on the concept of writing, as it comes to the traditional understanding of these terms. It suggests concentration on writing, as defined by Derrida, to go the route of understanding, pushing the mind to imagine the post-impact kind of definition, all of which are going awareness or perception. Effect of showing his work in the form of Portrait (photo card), and the poster (the poster) and the name of science, and gesture and the spoken word and the written word, and others. The concentration on writing new understanding of the function of the impact. I imagine when my mind starts photograph or cognitive work I wanted to understand the significance of the photo, is a non-flammable material mind. Valzhn move in search of something far from what exists in the image (ie, search for something behind the ghostly imprint on the image), and that is the function of the difference. While the Phantom is the footprint impact. As the impact itself does not exist (GO, p. 167). Can be defined concentration on writing that this perception, the new that something, something absent, had left its mark (mark phantom) on the topics that create particular movements in the mind (and those fingerprints Phantom is the impact). Begins with the impact to work through differences and delay (difference + delay = Brother "T" Love) (20).
Are displayed in the traditional concept of language as a legend .. He was involved in it something mystical [Sophie]: such as near the sound of the meaning, and others. We note that the item is an item of Internal metaphysical, metaphysics was controlled on our perception of language. Derrida has coined the new terms and the form of new concepts to an understanding of the language consists of a liberal concept of metaphysics. For this reason, The liberalization of understanding the language of metaphysics to remove ambiguity and confusion, as they are to get rid of the mysterious element completely. The removal of ambiguity is in fact remove the Ostrp (legendary character) also (21). It is right to say that the elimination of the dismantling of what is mystical and remove Alostrp in the traditional understanding of the language.
Have involved this study for dismantling the three phases, first phase consisted in shedding light on the concepts of speech and writing, and included the two central processing units, namely: the reason that lies behind the belief that says the primacy of speech and the priority to write, and how well the dimension and its relation to metaphysics in effect. And studied in the second stage claim lingual view of modern linguistics that add character to the scientific study of language and made it a field scientifically. Consisted issues are its central, which had been considered at this stage to confirm that the concept lingual of the mark is another image of the traditional concept of speech and writing, and that the linguistics of modern is the victim of metaphysics, comprising the third stage of the description terms Derrida and evaluation: The difference, impact and original writing. Has been highlighted by the significance of the term concentration on writing from the perspective of Derrida.
Based on the above, has changed our understanding of the language, what is the fate of the criticism? Starts with the answer to this question on the assumption that literature is a form of writing, though the poem or story or any literary work is the structure of the effects .. Those effects that we know the hallmarks of ghost do not know what it is but we are confident of the entity and existence. The criticism, which is known as primarily a search word, line, text, or anything that moves the mind from the point of perception specific to the worlds of research together with a strong motive to interpretation, it begins doubt, suspicion, based on persuasion. Critic doubted the appearance of the tag (such as word, line, and the story of the statue, image and Portrita, ... etc.) because it has convinced that the fact that it appears to him is not everything, but there is something else, we are not satisfied with things as they are, but we want to search in. The incursion beyond its borders to discover the secrets because we feel that there is something missing or something is absent from what we imagined and we know physically, and that this eternal feeling that there is something missing or absent is the original writing. Literature is one of the types of speech writing for the original, while the drawing is another kind, and music is also another kind, and works in the effects of original writing in the subjects. The effects is like a foot print .. It is the one who walked on the sand? We walked one and left behind the effects of his feet in every place, and all the prints left behind it only reminds us that it is missing and absent. Can be defined as original writing as our understanding of the fact that it is missing, and it is absent, and accompanied by a sense of the suffering generated by the experience, which discern their inability to detect the absent despite the silence applied or Anva blatant, every fingerprint left by behind him are the effects as they are confirmed to attend This is absent in spite of his absence, the position of Fayala really weird! (And perhaps the diagnosis - that is to give personal qualities on non-rational - version of the simplification, but it may help to understand).
He used the traditional exchange impressions with an idea through the confrontation with the literary work, and this is why the criticism of the poem discovery of meaning. Therefore, the meaning of an idea or concept can be attached to the idea of another concept or another and we continue this placement to latch onto these ideas in the idea of transcendent entity or transcendent truth. But we are not aware of the fact that what we call "meaning" is in fact the idea of metaphysics take refuge. Has not escaped the structural, which is said to be a revolutionary process, from the grip of metaphysics, but to say that the structural layout suggests, means that there is a center somewhere, and that the center is the central concept, which can be detected as the concept of transcendental entity or authority. This suggests the concept of pattern that everything on the concept of best, or that it is subject to at least understand, Where found format eliminates the confusion or obfuscation. And confirm that the dismantling of these illusions, as they all are claiming that the truth or entity is a "fabrication" and nothing else. These words represent Fberkat huge point to a failure in our search for meaning, and this means in some stage of the history of the search for meaning, the researchers announced, for one reason or another, they got to the last possible point of their research and that it should not do any research other than this point , and the purpose of protecting what they called the "final point" of the humiliation that can be attributed to them for future research, attributed to that point, a kind of sacred and named it the truth or the truth of Being, or being anything else. Has worked the final search point or concept in the Bible the center of criticism of both types of traditional and structural. Therefore, there was a great fool walked on guided our cash and our understanding of the language.
These comments do not suggest that what has been written is pure fiction? I believe that the dismantling suggests so. This includes our holy books too! (In fact, disassembly is not recognized something called a book, but the texts only). What about the concept of "Lord" then? The fate of the other concepts that innumerable such as: the source origin, truth and being and the transcendent reality and ... Etc.? That Derrida does not deny the existence of God, but he wondered, as indirectly, for our understanding of God and its relevance, and perhaps we use the term "Lord" god to refer to the god of a particular system of defense for the protection of the concept of source and truth of Being and similar terms. What is the real source of true or truth which should be sought therein. This may be the concepts behind the scope of human comprehension. May be the world the truth, or God, a world forbidden to humans who can not do anything Bizaih only imagine, or configure the meaning of Wah him at best. He was the absence of the Supreme Being Supreme and doubt, and that this sense of absence and longing for the presence of the original writing, but the hallmarks of the absent presence, which we know is everywhere impact. Through Derrida sought to view the metaphysical foundation upon which our understanding of the language, and try to edit our understanding of metaphysics, Derrida began to topple religions which sits in the kingdoms of the language. They accounted for religions and immunities provided protection to the concepts of metaphysics. However, it should recognize that Derrida suggests, indirectly, that the Lord behind all humanitarian concepts and verbal processors. It should be emphasized at this point in particular that Derrida does not indicate anything alarming, it is free to adopt the research methodology in the field of knowledge, trying to free the mind from the pressures and controls that were imposed in the name of God or religions. Derrida leads us strongly to rethink the source or truth through the presentation of the mind to the new freedom in the search, which is why Derrida and controversies involving his arguments on the spiritual implications.
Finally, I should return to the issue of cash. It was cash, in the traditional sense, in application of the model aims to understand a literary work, and this model may be philosophically or morally, religiously or linguistically. It is likely that the critic is not fully aware of the fact that it applies the particular model, what we call "self evaluation" is in reality a non-autonomous, we catch what is in the literary work something in the process of that understanding which leads to the calendar. It is possible that this "something" is a literary style, which gave the words and acts, actions and phenomena, the possibility of generating meaning. For example, if you tried to explain the poem The Lake Isle of Innisfree, will be able to, either by linking the content of the poem available information concerning the life of the poet ... that information pertaining to temperament and Kapth and musings in the nature of a rapidly changing, and the speed the demise of the beautiful things, the "anguish" of the gains material and his passion for life dreamy. Then I start to link these ideas in the poem of these ideas work in the external format to connect the ideas in the poem. For that reason, the ideas that abound in the poem is meaningful only when I proceed the process of linking these ideas to what is outside the poem. In addition, I may never look into the cause of depression causes of the poet and his love of life dreamy, and causes him to hate material gains. We note in this kind of criticism that the focus not be on the format itself, since the focus on the format to study the same pattern leads us to the structural. For example: What's the significance of the literary left home the President and going to the island? Is there Mgxiat other? Answer: Yes, certainly. And in some characters of Shakespeare comedy, such as the play "As You Like It" and "Night's Dream Midsummer" that the characters leave the city to Aizp forest where the resolution of conflicts and the spread of wisdom, and along these lines, a number of characters in the poems and novels that leave the city towards the isolated islands For example, the personality of "Prospero" in the play "Storm" and personal "Jelevr" in the novel "Jelevr flights." For this reason, we find that the desire of the poet Yeats to resort to the island of Innisfree desire to emulate the former book. We recognize that we understand the poem, we are familiar with this conviction, any conviction to leave the city and Mbahjha and resort to the island with great meaning in poetry, because there are convinced literary or agreement literary that this idea is the meaning of what, and so we find that can structural analysis to focus on other elements of the poem in order to study poetic style. Has been applied in the first example, any example of the application is not structural, certain models recognized in the literature on the poem only to understand the poem. In the second example, any example of structural explanation, used the poem and the elements to study the pattern poetry or literature to study the models accepted. It should be noted here that the dismantling is not any of these cases, or Nqeidahma.
Dismantlement critic does not give any examples, do not apply to any model of literary texts, but it destroys all the existing models do not provide any form, but writing this has caused dissociation of considerable uncertainty. Unlike the structural exchange does not believe in the existence of deconstructive criticism can be understood format. The pattern suggests the idea that things regularly or make them possible as well, but that this idea is really a source of consolation, we prefer the comfort of the uncertainty. In spite of the sympathy that may involve deception, but better than the suffering of the confusion. Announced structural, when confronted with the problem of complexity of the literature and minds behind the literary works of that complexity is subject to analysis and can be understood, and alleged a pattern could explain moral complications. It is an affirmation that will make the structural alleged this claim. Vabannioip is the assertion of human will and ability to solve it is complex, and on the contrary, looking into the possibility of disassembly lines, wondering about her and how that came in the traditions and moral standards to exist. Confrontation between human consciousness and coordinated the mark is so complex that difficult to understand. For this reason, confirms the dismantling, according to what is mentioned in David Allison David Allison, the need to rethink the whole problem of language (22). It may be necessary to have a new field of knowledge assets used words [Altothel] etymology and psychology together in one discipline to perform this task. We note here that the dismantling of discarded metaphysics and philosophy as the patterns of perception deceptive, as the linguistics which was concealing metaphysics in their models of language, not suitable for disassembly. Also do not resort to the dismantling of structural, which is based strongly on linguistics.
It may seem dismantling a field governed by rules and regulations of a particular language is difficult for the novice to understand, but the reality is different. We have rules and regulations and language, particularly in the more traditional monetary theories than in the disassembly. Valambtdi faces many technical terms such as character, plot, Thimp, image, code, lyric poetry, Sonitp, and ... Etc., have been utilized by over and over again the extent that they become normal because of it. Moreover, we did not understand that terminology such as "different", "impact", "authentic writing", ... Etc., we are not able to understand and accommodate any written work is part of this theory because it is difficult to understand anything new. However, one can benefit from learning this theory considerably if the Voltage first. These are interest we wonder the relevance of human understanding and his world and knowledge. Dismantling and cast Dia on our new property. Tells us that the power of language is not derived from the authority of literature and the pace of language because the power of language, like the authority of music, painting, sculpture, and ritual ... Etc., derived from a primitive sense of something missing and genuine absent, and direct human perception then.
Footnotes:
(1) This article was translated from a book (structural and disassembly) by S.. Ravindran, Structuralism & Deconstruction. By: S. Ravindran. (Translated)
(2) known as Jacques Derrida the term in his book "In Algramatologgio" [in the science of writing] that the study of literature and letters of the alphabet and clips of words and reading and writing, "saying it was based on the definition of Itre Littre, and that he did not find this term in this century, except in Gelb Gelb book titled "Lesson in Writing: Principles Algramatologgio" A Study of Writing: The Foundations of Grammatology (1952) / d. Mohammed Anani: terminology modern literary / author and symbolize a symbol OG. (translated)
(3) m. E. Abrams, "Angel deconstructive" Journal of Monetary Research 3 (1977), p. 428.
(4) Newton Garver, a prelude to the book "Sound and the phenomenon" (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973), p. xxii. Garver shows, commenting on the status of logic and theory in the philosophy of language, saying: "We find in the history of Western philosophy, the philosophy of language - including a lot of metaphysics - has adopted the logic than by rhetoric" (Preface, p. xi). But he made clear in his comment on the movements, which occurred in the latter part of the nineteenth century and the first part of the twentieth century, said: "It was the first movement to promote the philosophy of language-based reasoning, however, said the group had followed had been the destruction of that heritage, destructive talk about Derrida as the closing of the Metaphysics "(Preface, p. xii).
5 (c). Hillis Miller, "Critic, adding," Journal of Monetary Research j 3 (1977), p. 41.
(6) Murray Krieger, "Theory of Criticism" (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), p. 220-243.
(7) Frederic Jameson, "prison house of language" (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972), p. 176.
("I have been accompanied by coordinated language writing phonetic alphabet, so the format that generated a metaphysics based on the Logos, which defines the meaning of Being as the audience. This has been a concentration on the logos ringing always persecuted for reasons far removed from the reflection in the origin of writing and the place of ... . "(Jacques Derrida, in his" writing "When Giatri Chapraforte Spivak - Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1972), p. 43, quotations have been attached to the symbol (OG).
(9) has explained Jacques Derrida in his commentary on the background metaphysical concept of signifier - signified, saying: "This major difference between signifier and signified to the era, the other included the history of metaphysics, if we look at the issue from a narrow perspective and implicitly, but if we force perspective is even more we will consider in an era finiteness of creation and the Christian concepts that fit Greco "(OG, p. 13).
(10) uses Derrida's term logocentric (concentration on the logos), sometimes, rather than the term phonocentric (concentration on the sound) to refer to systems of thought, or habits of thought based on what he calls Bmitaveziqa attendance, a term that he found when Heidegger meant by the belief that there is center outside the text or outside the language to ensure the health of the meaning without it be challenged or search the truth (d. Mohammed Anani: modern literary terms). The Gaber Asfour recalled (the age of structural / edited by Edith Kirzuil / p. 274) that the Greeks the word logos refers to the floor that reflect the internal thought, or thought the same procedure. When referring Derrida to concentrate on the logos (which is interpreted by the bird to "the centrality of logos") is wanting to destroy the impact of overwhelming, and the destruction of the principle of fixed asset per, and coupled with the principle of finality or attic, and confirm the importance of writing that will not become a follower, but the first place. (Translated)
(11) possible to know about the positioning of logos Balmitaveziqa, because both expression of the desire proper sense. And find meaning in the logos on the concentration of all in the mind of the Logos, a word that reflects the mind of God.
(12) represents a concentration on the sound rejection of writing as a technology only. As well as the convergence of assurance spoken word phrase. The word is written not only serves as the meaning of the words.
(13) "launched this movement, which he calls the" form closed "based on the logos of the views of traditional or classical language (which confirms that they are based are Being transcendent Platonic, Christian, or attendance, which guarantees the meanings), to what I call" model based on writing " attendance, which is to serve as a "fingerprint on the white" (m. e. Abrams, "(Angel deconstructive", p. 429).
(14) Write First: The expression is derived from Freud, has used it to refer to the unconscious when he noticed a game for children include the impact of writing on the left after removing the wax paper. Derrida has used this concept, referring to Freud several times in his book "Writing and difference." He says: "The writing is a continuation of perception even before conscious awareness of itself. And memory or write is initiated the process awareness of awareness itself. The" perceived "it can be read only in the past, under the perception and beyond." (D. Mohammed Anani / modern literary terms). (Translated)
(15) Murray Krieger says that the key to the debate about the word difference (ie brother "T" Love) are playing on the French word which means differ involved in the following two: (1) to differ (which differ not like) (2) to defer (defer any or delay) depending on the difference between the various entities present (difference) and similar entities, one present and the other is absent between them a gap of time (delay). There are some aspects of deception in the "differance is that (a) inaudible but visible, and that the term may not correspond to any word, and thus it only serves to help remember the word that vary them, are not present in the concept of Abbaas different from themselves. (Theory Cash from 0.228 to 231).
(16) whilst the initial "rich" and pronounced the second "see" (translated).
(17) Derrida demonstrates in "writing and difference", saying: "Writing is one of the shapes that represent the overall impact, the same effect" (OG, p. 167). "The idea is that the impact could be subject to question the essence Aloonto - phenomenal ontophenomenological. Is the effect of nothing, which is not an entity, but it is beyond question that says:" What is? "(OG, p. 65).
(1 Giatri Spivak, a prelude to the book in his "writing" of Jacques Derrida (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1974), p. xxxix.
(19) Altoss: The term refers to the process that turns the standards and values and behavior patterns consistent. (Structural era / edited by Edith Kirzuil / translation Gaber Asfour / Dar Afaq Arabia for printing and publishing / 1985 / p. 277). (Translated)
(20) should pay attention to that Derrida derives the word difference differance to combine the difference difference (in the sense that the similarity) + deference (ie delay, according to the meaning of impact), which was replaced by the letter (e) in a different letter (a) seems to be different and clear this word but it is difficult to explain it until he was transferred to Arabic to the translator deliberately "writing and difference" Kadhim Jihad to develop a V characters between Mekovin small. (Translated)
(21) reflect the note C, Hillis Miller, the language attitude Tvkikia: "The language from the outset, imaginary and illusory and offset from any direct referral to the things as they are. And should be detained the human condition in a web of words intertwined over the centuries is rich in myths, concepts and measurements metaphysical in short, the whole pattern of Western metaphysics "(" Heritage and difference ") in the magazine" Dayakerteix "2.4 (1972), 11).
(22) David Allison, the introduction of the book "Sound and the phenomenon," p. xxxvii - vii i
No comments:
Post a Comment